Experienced Attorneys Working for You

McConnell, Sneed & Cohen is a full service general practice law firm providing a wide range of legal representation both within the metro Atlanta area and throughout the State of Georgia.

News and Events

Below are blog entries by our attorneys and new and pertinent law-related news items.

Contract Law Basics

Robert Sneed - Friday, July 24, 2009

In the current difficult economic climate, contract disputes are on the rise, whether related to service contracts, the sale of goods, agreements for the purchase of homes or businesses, residential and commercial leases, employment agreements, partnership agreements and other business venture agreements.  Thus, it is more important than ever for the parties to a contract to understand the rights they have under a contract, as well as the obligations they have assumed.  As Atlanta business litigation and contract attorneys, McConnell & Sneed have significant experience in representing both individuals and businesses regarding contract disputes, whether seeking to enforce the contract rights of their clients or defending against claims that a contract was breached. 

Most simply, a contract is an agreement between two or more parties which defines the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the matter at issue, such as the purchase of a home or the operation of a business.  Generally, in order for a contract to be created, one party must make an offer to do (or not do) something which the other party accepts, with something of value given to support the offer and acceptance.  

While many contracts are in writing (in fact, some kinds of contracts are required to be in writing), oral contracts may also be enforceable.  Also, depending on the type of contract, the law may impose certain duties on the parties even if the contract does not expressly address them or the parties never discussed them.  These are called “implied duties” and can have significant consequences for both parties.    

If a party fails to perform its obligations under a contract without a legal excuse, it is called a breach of contract.  Depending on the significance of the breach and the terms of the contract, it may excuse the non-breaching party’s obligation to perform under the contract.  Also, a party may commit an “anticipatory” breach of contract if, before they are due to perform, they indicate by words or actions that they do not intend to perform as required. 

Upon a breach of the contract by one party, the non-breaching party can pursue various remedies.  Generally, these remedies may include the following:    

(1)    Actual Damages - Money to put the non-breaching party in the position he/she expected to be in if the other party had fully performed as required.  In some circumstances, instead of being measured by such expectations, actual damages will be the amount expended by the non-breaching party in reliance on the contract or the amount required to restore the non-breaching party to the position he/she was in before the contract. 

(2)    Consequential and Incidental Damages – In addition to actual damages, money for losses caused by the breach that the parties, at the time of entering the contract, could have reasonably foreseen would arise in the event of a breach.

(3)    Attorneys’ Fees and Costs – Potentially recoverable if expressly provided for in the contract or if the breaching party acted in bad faith or was stubbornly litigious.

(4)    Liquidated Damages – Money damages agreed to by the parties in the contract that would be payable by the breaching party.  These provisions are not always enforceable, however, and must, among other requirements, be a reasonable estimate of the anticipated loss in the event of a breach.  

(5)    Specific Performance – A court order requiring a party to perform exactly as specified in the contract.  This remedy is generally unavailable, however, where a party can be compensated for the breach with money damages as described above.  The most common application of this remedy is in contracts for the sale of real estate or other unique property.

(6)    Rescission – The contract is canceled and both sides are excused from further performance.  The parties would then have the right to seek to be returned to their respective positions before the contract, which could require the restitution of any money or benefits advanced from one party to the other.

If you believe you have been harmed by a breach of contract, it is important to consult with an attorney to understand what remedies may be available to you.  Likewise, if you have been accused of breaching a contract, it is critical that you know what defenses you may have to any claimed liability and if you have any counterclaims for damages against the other party.  The attorneys at McConnell & Sneed have the knowledge and experience to advise you on these issues and will aggressively represent your interests in any contract dispute.


New Domain Names

Robert Sneed - Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Here at McConnell & Sneed, we are always striving to provide our clients and potential clients with more ways to access us and to learn about various legal issues.  As a part of this attempt to educate and help the public, we have obtained four new internet domain names that all direct to our website.  Now when people search for these specific terms, people will be able to contact us for either help or information.  The new domain names are:
Hopefully, in the future we will be able to obtain additional domain names that relate to other areas of law that our attorneys practice.  As always, we are there to answer any questions you may have and, as always, all initial consultations are free of charge.

Paper Shredder Safety Alert

Robert Sneed - Friday, July 10, 2009
In our personal injury law practice in Atlanta, Georgia, we see many traumatic injury cases.  Recently, McConnell & Sneed was hired to represent the interests of a four year old child whose hand and fingers were severely mutilated in a home shredder. Sadly, she lost parts of three of her fingers.

With the ominous rise in identity theft cases, more and more people have been purchasing paper shredders for their homes.  But recent studies show that these paper shredders can lead to finger injuries, mutilations, lacerations -- and even amputations -- in young children.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recently investigated home paper shredder injuries. Their research shows that 22 (71 percent) of the 31 home paper shredder injuries were to children under 12 years of age.  Over half of those injuries involved children under 3 years of age.

As recently discussed on parents.com, children like to imitate adult behavior, and using a paper shredder is no exception.  Since most paper shredders were originally built for office use, they do not include child-safety components.  THE CPSC assessed that a home paper shredder's opening (where paper is inserted) ranges from 13 to 16.5 inches, allowing easy access for a toddler's little fingers.  And every one of these machines potentially allowed a child's fingers to reach through to the cutting blades.  In addition, most of these shredders do not include on/off buttons and instead are automatically activated when papers (or fingers) are placed in the opening.  Researchers concluded the article with a call to manufacturers to redesign the shredders to make them safer for children and to display clear warnings directly on the machines

The CPSC offers the following safety tips -- to protect both parents and children -- for your home paper shredder:
  • Never allow children to operate paper shredders, even under adult supervision.  Paper shredders can pull childrens' fingers into the shredder mechanism
  • Place the paper shredder in an area less accessible to children.
  • Unplug the paper shredder power cord when the shredder is not in use.
  • Do not place hands or fingers in the shredder opening.
  • Do not operate a paper shredder while wearing loose fitting clothing that may enter the shredder opening.
  • Keep hair and items, such as a tie or long necklace, away from the shredder opening.
The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission recently issued the following Paper Shredder Safety Alert:


Paper Shredder Safety Alert

Consumer model paper shredders are growing in popularity. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) wants you and your family to be safe if you have a paper shredder. From January 2000 through September 2005, CPSC received 50 reports of incidents involving finger amputations, lacerations, and other finger injuries from paper shredders. The majority of injuries were to young children under age 5.

Young children are interested in imitating adult activities, and children may try to activate the shredder when an adult is not present. This puts children at risk of injury.

Injuries can occur even when an adult is supervising a child. Children’s fingers can be pulled into the paper shredding mechanism if they don’t let the paper go.

Never allow children to operate a paper shredder, even under adult supervision. Injuries can still occur. The pull force of the shredder can draw a child’s fingers into the shredding mechanism.



Doggie Doors Combined with Crawling Kids and Toddlers Can Lead to Serious Personal Injuries and Death

Robert Sneed - Friday, June 26, 2009

Many families with pet dogs install doggie doors to allow easy access for dogs to go in and out of a house or patio area. Doggie doors are very convenient. Doggie doors can also be dangerous in that small children / toddlers get out of house through the doggie door. Once out of the house, small children / toddlers have been known to suffer serious personal injuries and death from pools, ponds, and other dangers outside of the house. In August 2006, Matthew Ranfone got out of a doggie door from his Orlando home and was found floating face down in the family pool. He died later from drowning related injuries. Carol Ranone, Matthew's mother, has launched a website to get the word out about the dangers of pet doors / doggie doors and small children atwww.petacessdangers.org. We recommend that all dog owners who are parents of small children or who have small children in their home to take a look at the website. The safety of small children / toddlers is much more important than the mere convenience of a doggie door. Safeguard your home to the best of your ability to protect children who live or visit your home.

You can read more about the dangers of doggie doors at Pet Doors and Crawling Kids Can Be a Deadly Combination.

New Faces and New Office!

Robert Sneed - Wednesday, May 27, 2009
We at McConnell & Sneed, LLC are in the middle of an exciting time.  

We are very proud to welcome Joe Coomes as a partner in the firm.  As described in detail on his Attorney Bio page, Joe comes to us with a great deal of complex business and real estate litigation experience.  Joe has worked for several very well-known and respected law firms before deciding to join McConnell & Sneed as a partner.  Joe's background provides the firm with an additional level of civil expertise that further allows us to provide our clients with a broad range of legal representation.  Steve and I are both very excited about what Joe adds to the firm and we are very proud to call him our partner.

We are also very happy to announce the addition of Candice Harris to the team as a Legal Assistant.  Candice brings a new perspective to the firm and has quickly become an indispensable member of our team.  We are confident that Candice will be a valuable member of our firm for a long time to come.

Finally, with the addition of Joe and Candice detailed above, the firm needed additional office space.  On May 4, 2009, we moved to a larger office literally right across the street from our old office.  We are now located in the Tower Place 100 building in Buckhead, home to many respectable lawyers and law firms, as well as other Atlanta mainstays such as Buckhead Coalition, Inc. and Solomon Brothers Fine Jewelry.  We are very excited about the move and welcome anyone to stop by to say hello.

Best Regards,
Rob Sneed

Effectiveness of MRIs in Diagnosing Spinal Problems

Robert Sneed - Friday, January 02, 2009

There is extensive literature documenting that spinal imaging is essentially worthless for anything but showing what is causing the radiculopathy after the clinical diagnosis of radiculopathy has been made.

 Of the two causes for 98% of the patients with chronic headaches, neck and/or upper back pain (facet joint or discogenic pain), an MRI, CT or myelogram is incapable of distinguishing asymptomatic patients from those with pain.

It almost exclusively distinguishes 15 year olds from 40 year olds because the aging changes that are medically called spondylosis and inaccurately referred to as degenerative changes NEVER cause pain.
 
They may predispose a patient to an injury that causes pain, but they don't cause it (thus, you have an "eggshell skull" case).
 
The disc ages in two ways:
 
The center part of the disc (the nucleus) has no blood supply and gets its nutrition from the cartilage on the vertebral endplates above and below each disc.
 
As the person goes beyond the mid teens (autopsies during Viet Nam showed the disc degeneration had already begun by the late teens), the nucleus that is initially 80% water gradually dries out and gets chunky.
 
Also as we age, the disc anulus gets small tears and loses structural integrity after any one of the countless twisting movements we make in life.
 
Neither of these changes causes pain, and there is extensive scientific literature (some of it award winning) proving it's correct.
 
At the same time the boney spine builds up perfectly normal bone on top of other perfectly normal bone.
 
Bone spurs are examples of this.
 
Unless the buildup is extensive enough to narrow the central spinal canal where the spinal cord (in the neck or mid back) or cauda equina (in the low back) is enclosed and can be compressed, the central buildup is irrelevant.
 
Similarly, if it happens to a sufficient degree laterally to compress the neuroforamen where a nerve root exits (the narrowing can be the result of a combination of bone buildup and disc compression and/or bulging) and causes a radiculopathy it would be significant but without a radiculopathy it is not.
 
The page of polysyllabic discussion on the MRI report is an accurate description of these changes but could be summarized with "normal for age" and be just as accurate and helpful.
 
The long and detailed reports typically change neither the diagnosis or the treatment.

Welcome to the McConnell & Sneed Blog!

Robert Sneed - Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Welcome to our first blog post on our newly redesigned website.  We hope to provide you with the latest news and happenings from our firm and from the legal community.  We will post links to important articles and onlines posts, providing you with the information you need to make important law-related daily decisions.  

We are happy you decided to take a look at our website, and of course, should you ever have any questions at all, we are always a phone call away. 

I hope you enjoy and feel free to let us know what you think!



990 Hammond Drive, Suite 840 Atlanta, Georgia 30328
404-665-3090 tel   |   404-665-3476 fax
©McConnell, Sneed & Cohen, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Web site powered by Logicblock's Online Business Builder